- evidence of SMIG underpayment
- Payslips, bank statements, time records, messages and witness statements are used to compare the wages due with the payments received.
- remedies for work without a contract
- Article 18 of the Labour Code allows an unwritten employment relationship to be proved by any means.
- formal wage payment notice
- The formal notice must identify the periods, quantify the claim and be sent by a method providing a legally certain date.
- wage limitation period in Morocco
- Article 395 of the Labour Code generally sets a two-year limitation period for claims arising from an individual employment relationship.
- interruption of the wage limitation period
- Court proceedings, a written acknowledgment of debt or an extrajudicial demand satisfying the statutory conditions may interrupt the limitation period.
- joint liability for subcontractor wages
- Article 86 of the Labour Code may make the principal contractor jointly liable for the subcontractor’s wage debts under the conditions it provides.
Begin by reconstructing the wages due month by month. The table must distinguish normal hours, overtime, the rate applicable to each period, the seniority bonus and the amounts actually received. Expense reimbursements, professional allowances and bonuses paid to compensate for a particular constraint cannot always make up for a basic wage below the SMIG. This classification depends on the nature of each amount. In practical terms, a separate column for each item avoids claiming the same amount twice or overlooking a premium.
Keep the contract, amendments, payslips, bank statements, cash receipts, time records and CNSS statements. Professional WhatsApp messages, emails, access badges, photographs taken at the workplace and witness statements may establish working hours or the very existence of the employment. Article 18 of the Labour Code allows the contract to be proved by any means. A payslip provides information about what the employer declares, but does not by itself prove that the net amount was actually paid. The employer must be able to prove the payment it claims to have made.
The formal notice must specify the months concerned, the rate actually applied, the statutory rate, the hours counted and the provisional total claimed. It may be delivered against receipt, served by a judicial officer or sent by registered mail with acknowledgment of receipt. Under the rules in Articles 381 et seq. of the dahir establishing the Code of Obligations and Contracts, an extrajudicial demand bearing a legally certain date and clearly placing the debtor in default may interrupt the limitation period. As a precaution, when the deadline is approaching, bringing court proceedings remains the safest course of action.
Article 395 of the Labour Code generally subjects individual employment claims to a two-year limitation period. The limitation period for each wage payment runs from its own due date. A court claim interrupts the period under the statutory conditions, as does the employer’s written and unequivocal acknowledgment of the debt. A complaint to the labour inspectorate, a telephone call or an oral promise should not automatically be regarded as interrupting the period. Evidence of every action must be retained, and the court should be petitioned promptly if the oldest monthly payments are approaching the two-year limit.
When an employee works for a subcontractor, the latter’s insolvency does not always end the available remedies. Article 86 of the Labour Code provides, in the situations and within the limits it defines, for the principal contractor’s joint liability for certain wage-related and social security obligations of the subcontractor. The service provider’s commercial register, place of performance, subcontract and the identity of the actual contracting entity must be checked. This analysis is particularly useful in security services, cleaning, construction, materials handling and outsourced services.