- Reservations upon handover of keys
- Visible defects must be described precisely in the delivery report before it is signed.
- Apartment not compliant with plans
- Non-compliance is proved by comparing the delivered property with the contractual plans and specifications.
- Latent defect in new apartment
- A latent defect is a defect that is not normally detectable and affects the use or value of the property.
- DOC warranty for property defects
- Articles 549 to 574 of the DOC govern the warranty against defects, with the time limit for immovable property provided by Article 572.
- Ten-year warranty in Morocco
- Article 769 of the DOC covers certain serious defects attributable to the specified builders for ten years.
- One-year warranty for equipment
- Article 769, paragraph 2, provides within its scope one-year protection for certain equipment separable from the structure.
- Reduction in property price
- A reduction in price requires proof of the non-compliance and the resulting loss in value.
Upon handover of the keys, the buyer must compare the dwelling with the contract, plans and specifications. The buyer checks the surface area, partitions, openings, parking space, finishes, connections, equipment and accessible common areas. Visible differences are recorded in a dated report, with a usable description and, if possible, photographs. If the seller refuses to include the reservations, they may be notified immediately by a bailiff. An oral promise to repair does not replace a written reservation.
Articles 549 to 574 of the DOC govern the warranty against defects in the item sold. For immovable property, the special time limit for bringing an action must be sought in Article 572, not Article 573, which concerns the sale of animals. Subject to its conditions and the legal grounds for interruption or suspension, Article 572 establishes a one-year period after delivery for actions relating to defects in immovable property. The special provisions of Articles 618-1 et seq. and the valid VEFA terms must also be examined.
An apparent defect could have been detected through a normally diligent inspection upon delivery. A latent defect was not reasonably detectable and affects the use or value of the dwelling. This distinction determines the evidence, notices and remedies. Upon discovering water ingress, a crack or a network defect, the buyer must preserve photographs, obtain a diagnostic assessment and notify the seller. Waiting several months may facilitate a dispute over the discovery date, maintenance of the property or aggravation of the damage.
Article 769 of the DOC establishes the ten-year liability of the architect, engineer and contractor, according to their respective assignments, for serious defects affecting the structural integrity or intended use of the building. Paragraph 2 also provides, within its scope, a one-year warranty for certain equipment separable from the structure. It is therefore incorrect to state that such equipment is protected only by a contractual warranty. However, there is no general two-year warranty identical to the French regime: the classification of the construction project, equipment and damage remains decisive.
The ten-year period is linked to acceptance of the works, but Article 769 also requires prompt action after the damage becomes apparent. According to the prevailing case law of the Moroccan Court of Cassation, the short period for bringing an action runs from the actual discovery of the damage giving rise to the warranty, not automatically from acceptance. The Court of Cassation’s public database is cited in support of this position; no unverified judgment number is reproduced here. In practice, an immediate expert assessment and consultation help avoid a dispute over admissibility.
Depending on the seriousness, the buyer may request compliance, the cost of the works, a reduction in price, damages or termination. For 2025-2026, a private expert assessment often costs 2,000 to 10,000 DH, while a complex court-ordered expert assessment may require an advance deposit of 5,000 to more than 20,000 DH. These ranges observed in practice remain indicative. The court sets the amount according to the assignment, the number of dwellings, the technical specialisations and the expert’s travel.